Difference between revisions of "Issue:Headingmode definition buggy output"
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Version = 1.5.0 | |Version = 1.5.0 | ||
|Description = Headingmode definition buggy output. The html is wrong for the output, some tags are transformed in html special chars. | |Description = Headingmode definition buggy output. The html is wrong for the output, some tags are transformed in html special chars. | ||
| − | |Status = | + | |Status = answered |
}} | }} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Reply == | == Reply == | ||
| − | <DPL>debug=5 | + | Thanks for bringing this up. Adding "debug=5" shows the html code: |
| + | <DPL> | ||
| + | debug=5 | ||
category=African Union member states | category=African Union member states | ||
ordermethod=category,title | ordermethod=category,title | ||
headingmode=definition | headingmode=definition | ||
| + | count=4 | ||
</DPL> | </DPL> | ||
| + | |||
| + | To me this seems to be syntactically correct. Experimenting a little showed the following: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pre><nowiki><DL><DT>a term</DT><DD>its definition</DD></DL></nowiki></pre> | ||
| + | produces: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <DL><DT>a term</DT><DD>its definition</DD></DL> | ||
| + | |||
| + | whereas | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pre><nowiki><DL><DT>a term<DD>its definition</DL></nowiki></pre> | ||
| + | produces: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <DL><DT>a term<DD>its definition</DL> | ||
| + | |||
| + | So it seems that I would have to produce syntactically incorrect html code to get it through the wiki parser. Very strange. Would you like to bring that up for mediawiki developers? | ||
| + | |||
| + | As an alternative I could generate wiki syntax | ||
| + | <pre><nowiki>;[[:Nigunda]]:its definition</nowiki></pre> | ||
| + | This should also work: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ;[[:Nigunda]]:its definition | ||
| + | |||
| + | You could easily change this in your DPL code (lines 3019..3024) but it would prevent you from using <tt>hlistattr</tt>. Is that relevant for <tt>headingmode=definition</tt>? If not I could make the changes and publish .. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please look at line 2988. DOes it make sense to add DD and DL here ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | BTW: Would you like to rejoin the develoment team (which is, sad to say, only me alone at the moment ...) ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[[User:Gero|Gero]] 19:17, 23 October 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Maybe you want to try "$wgUseTidy = true;". It might help ... [[User:Gero|Gero]] 17:54, 24 November 2007 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:54, 24 November 2007
| Description: | Headingmode definition buggy output. The html is wrong for the output, some tags are transformed in html special chars. |
| Extension / Version: | DPL / 1.5.0 |
| Type / Status: | Bug / answered |
Problem
To reproduce:
<DPL> category=African Union member states ordermethod=category,title headingmode=definition </DPL>
Reply
Thanks for bringing this up. Adding "debug=5" shows the html code:
{{Extension DPL}}<DL><DT>[[:Category:African_Union_member_states|African Union member states]]</DT><DD><UL><LI>[[Cameroon|Cameroon]]</LI><LI>[[Nigeria|Nigeria]]</LI><LI>[[Somalia|Somalia]]</LI><LI>[[Sudan|Sudan]]</LI></UL></DD></DL>
To me this seems to be syntactically correct. Experimenting a little showed the following:
<DL><DT>a term</DT><DD>its definition</DD></DL>
produces:
- a term
- its definition
whereas
<DL><DT>a term<DD>its definition</DL>
produces:
- a term
- its definition
So it seems that I would have to produce syntactically incorrect html code to get it through the wiki parser. Very strange. Would you like to bring that up for mediawiki developers?
As an alternative I could generate wiki syntax
;[[:Nigunda]]:its definition
This should also work:
- Nigunda
- its definition
You could easily change this in your DPL code (lines 3019..3024) but it would prevent you from using hlistattr. Is that relevant for headingmode=definition? If not I could make the changes and publish ..
Please look at line 2988. DOes it make sense to add DD and DL here ?
BTW: Would you like to rejoin the develoment team (which is, sad to say, only me alone at the moment ...) ?
- Gero 19:17, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
Maybe you want to try "$wgUseTidy = true;". It might help ... Gero 17:54, 24 November 2007 (CET)
