Difference between revisions of "Wgraph:Sample Genealogy"
From FollowTheScore
(New page: This examples demonstrates the power of ''wgraph'' in combination with # mediawiki templates # the ''Dynamic Page List'' extension (DPL). We will guide you through a series of steps wher...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This | + | This example demonstrates the power of ''wgraph'' in combination with |
# mediawiki templates | # mediawiki templates | ||
# the ''Dynamic Page List'' extension (DPL). | # the ''Dynamic Page List'' extension (DPL). | ||
| − | We will guide you through a series of steps where a small genealogy tree is | + | We will guide you through a series of steps where a small genealogy tree is built. |
We start with a straight forward approach and show how a very high level of abstraction can be reached. | We start with a straight forward approach and show how a very high level of abstraction can be reached. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* We concentrate on the semantics | * We concentrate on the semantics | ||
* We do not use any coordinates or size attributes for the shapes | * We do not use any coordinates or size attributes for the shapes | ||
| − | * | + | * we use nodetypes (''male, female, info'') to share common properties |
* we use edgetypes (''mother, father, married to, info'') for the same purpose | * we use edgetypes (''mother, father, married to, info'') for the same purpose | ||
* we mark undefined nodes in a special way | * we mark undefined nodes in a special way | ||
Revision as of 14:19, 15 August 2007
This example demonstrates the power of wgraph in combination with
- mediawiki templates
- the Dynamic Page List extension (DPL).
We will guide you through a series of steps where a small genealogy tree is built.
We start with a straight forward approach and show how a very high level of abstraction can be reached.
Please go carefully through each step to understand the architecture of the final result.
First we define a small genealogy tree directly in WGL
- We concentrate on the semantics
- We do not use any coordinates or size attributes for the shapes
- we use nodetypes (male, female, info) to share common properties
- we use edgetypes (mother, father, married to, info) for the same purpose
- we mark undefined nodes in a special way
Thus we reach a fair level of abstraction.
{{#wgraph: svg | wgl | thumb = 80 |
node Gero_Scholz { type male label "Gero Scholz\n* 24.09.1956" }
node Rosa_Scholz { type female label "Rosa Scholz\n* 05.07.1949" }
node Bernhard_Scholz { type male label "Bernhard Scholz\n* 31.07.1987" }
node Andreas_Scholz { type male label "Andreas Scholz\n* 18.01.1989" }
node Lena_Scholz { type female label "Lena Scholz\n* 14.03.1994" }
edge Lena_Scholz Gero_Scholz { type father }
edge Andreas_Scholz Gero_Scholz { type father }
edge Bernhard_Scholz Gero_Scholz { type father }
edge Lena_Scholz Rosa_Scholz { type mother }
edge Andreas_Scholz Rosa_Scholz { type mother }
edge Bernhard_Scholz Rosa_Scholz { type mother }
edge Rosa_Scholz Gero_Scholz { type marriage label 02.01.1987 }
edge Rosa_Scholz Rosa_Scholz_info { type info }
edge Gero_Scholz Gero_Scholz_info { type info }
node Gero_Scholz_info { type info label "that & this" }
node Rosa_Scholz_info { type info label "this and that" }
nodetype male { shape box color #ddddff bordercolor #9999ff width 140 textwidth 20 }
nodetype female { shape box color #ffdddd bordercolor #ff9999 width 140 textwidth 20 }
edgetype father { color #7777ff }
edgetype mother { color #ff7777 }
edgetype marriage { kind rightnear arrowstyle line backarrowstyle line backarrowsize 10 color #ff77ff }
nodetype info { color #f0f0f0 borderstyle dashed bordercolor #e0e0e0 }
edgetype info { kind near arrowstyle none linestyle dotted color lightgray }
nodetype 'undefined node' { bordercolor red label '%%?' }
orientation bottom_to_top splines yes
}}
continue with Wgraph:Sample Genealogy 2 ..
