Difference between revisions of "Issue:Redirects=include fails with hashmark"
From FollowTheScore
(→Problem) |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
It works if you use "include=%0[100]", so there's something special (and wrong) about "#". | It works if you use "include=%0[100]", so there's something special (and wrong) about "#". | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Actually the problem might be different: if an article has '''no headings''', then <nowiki>include=#</nowiki> gets none of the text. (This is the case with redirect pages.) This seems wrong: a "#" should pull in all text up to the first heading, or if there is no heading, pull in the whole page. [[User:Maiden taiwan|Maiden taiwan]] 19:20, 4 June 2008 (CEST) | ||
== Reply == | == Reply == | ||
Revision as of 19:20, 4 June 2008
| Description: | "redirects=include" fails with "include=#": no article text |
| Extension / Version: | DPL / 1.7.4 |
| Type / Status: | Bug / open |
Problem
This example outputs no article text for redirects:
<dpl> category = Whatever include = # redirects = include </dpl>
That is, for articles of the form:
#REDIRECT [[foo]] [[Category:Whatever]]
You get the article name in the bullet, but no article text from "foo". If "redirects=include" really works, you should get the initial text from the target article.
It works if you use "include=%0[100]", so there's something special (and wrong) about "#".
- Actually the problem might be different: if an article has no headings, then include=# gets none of the text. (This is the case with redirect pages.) This seems wrong: a "#" should pull in all text up to the first heading, or if there is no heading, pull in the whole page. Maiden taiwan 19:20, 4 June 2008 (CEST)
