Difference between revisions of "Issue:Firstrevisionsince excludes too many pages"

From FollowTheScore
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{Issue |Type = Bug |Extension = DPL |Version = 1.8.0 |Description = Firstrevisionsince excludes too many pages |Status = open }} == Problem == I updated from DPL 1...)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
 
* http://www.thomas-krenn.com/de/wiki/Benutzer:Wfischer/Test2
 
* http://www.thomas-krenn.com/de/wiki/Benutzer:Wfischer/Test2
 
(I included "debug=3" in these examples)
 
(I included "debug=3" in these examples)
 +
 +
== Reply ==
 +
 +
There have been major changes in this part of the code (some of them before 1.7.4), so it is likely to be an error that was involuntarily introduced.
 +
I will look after it. [[User:Gero|Gero]] 21:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:35, 8 June 2009

Description: Firstrevisionsince excludes too many pages
Extension / Version: DPL   /   1.8.0
Type / Status: Bug   /   open

Problem

I updated from DPL 1.7.4 to 1.8.0 and recognized that "firstrevisionsince" excludes too many pages on my query in http://www.thomas-krenn.com/de/wiki/Benutzer:Wfischer#Neueste_Artikel_von_Werner_Fischer_seit_1.12.2008 I tried to downgrade back to 1.7.4 but this does not fix the problem. I'm not 100% sure whether the page still worked correctly before the update to 1.8.0, but the Google Cache entry from "26. Mai 2009 03:43:42 GMT" still showed the complete list: http://209.85.129.132/search?q=cache:vxO-r7k8Uf4J:www.thomas-krenn.com/de/wiki/Benutzer:Wfischer+http://www.thomas-krenn.com/de/wiki/Benutzer:Wfischer&cd=1&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=at&client=firefox-a

I created two pages in our wiki to document the issue. The first page Benutzer:Wfischer/Test1 includes firstrevisionsince=2008-12-01 and shows 20 results. The second page Benutzer:Wfischer/Test2 does not include the firstrevisionsince=2008-12-01 statement and shows 69 results back to the date 1st december 2008.

(I included "debug=3" in these examples)

Reply

There have been major changes in this part of the code (some of them before 1.7.4), so it is likely to be an error that was involuntarily introduced. I will look after it. Gero 21:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)