Difference between revisions of "Issue:DPL does not work with Cite-Extension under MW1.12/Demo1"

Revision as of 16:51, 3 February 2011

This is a test page regarding the CITE extension and DPL.

The we observe the following:

f1
f2
r

will produce references for f1 and f2

f1
f2
r
d

will produce references for f1 and f2

d
f1
f2
r

will produce references for f1 and f2

f1
f2
d
r

will produce NO references

f1
d
f2
r

will produce references ONLY for f2

f1
r
d
f2
r

will produce two references, one for f1 and another one for f1 and f2

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This is a test page regarding the CITE extension and DPL.<br/>
-* This is footnote<ref>number 1</ref> number 1.
+* Let "f" be a line that contains a "ref"-tag
-* This is footnote<ref>number 2</ref> number 2.
+* Let "r" be the "references"-tag.
+* Let "d" be a dpl statement
-----
+The we observe the following:
-* if we have a DPL statement in the article AFTER the "references" tag, everything works fine.
-The end.
-* if the "references" tag comes after the DPL statement, we will have no footnotes.
-* This is footnote<ref>number 3</ref> number 3.
+ f1
-* This is footnote<ref>number 4</ref> number 4.
+ f2
+ r
+will produce references for f1 and f2
+ f1
+ f2
+ r
+ d
+will produce references for f1 and f2
+ d
+ f1
+ f2
+ r
+will produce references for f1 and f2
+ f1
+ f2
+ d
+ r
+will produce NO references
+ f1
+ d
+ f2
+ r
+will produce references ONLY for f2
+ f1
+ r
+ d
+ f2
+ r
+will produce two references, one for f1 and another one for f1 and f2
+* f1<ref>footnote 1</ref>
+<references />
 <dpl>
@@ Line 19: / Line 52: @@
 </dpl>
-<references/>
+* f2<ref>footnote 2</ref>
+<references />