Difference between revisions of "Issue:DPL does not work with Cite-Extension under MW1.12/Demo1"

From FollowTheScore
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This is a test page regarding the CITE extension and DPL.<br/>
 
This is a test page regarding the CITE extension and DPL.<br/>
This is a text with a footnote<ref>This is some footnote-text</ref>.<br/>
+
 
And another footnote<ref>The second remark</ref> ist here.<br/>
+
* This is footnote<ref>number 1</ref> number 1.
 +
* This is footnote<ref>number 2</ref> number 2.
 +
 
 +
----
  
 
* if we have a DPL statement in the article AFTER the "references" tag, everything works fine.
 
* if we have a DPL statement in the article AFTER the "references" tag, everything works fine.
 
The end.
 
The end.
 +
* if the "references" tag comes after the DPL statement, we will have no footnotes.
 +
 +
* This is footnote<ref>number 3</ref> number 3.
 +
* This is footnote<ref>number 4</ref> number 4.
  
<references/>
 
  
 
<dpl>
 
<dpl>
 
   namespace=
 
   namespace=
   titlematch=A%
+
   titlematch=Ab%
 
</dpl>
 
</dpl>
 +
 +
<references/>

Revision as of 16:27, 3 February 2011

This is a test page regarding the CITE extension and DPL.

  • This is footnote<ref>number 1</ref> number 1.
  • This is footnote<ref>number 2</ref> number 2.

  • if we have a DPL statement in the article AFTER the "references" tag, everything works fine.

The end.

  • if the "references" tag comes after the DPL statement, we will have no footnotes.
  • This is footnote<ref>number 3</ref> number 3.
  • This is footnote<ref>number 4</ref> number 4.


<references/>