Difference between revisions of "Issue:RSS from DPL?"

From FollowTheScore
Jump to: navigation, search
(Hi Gero)
 
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
== Reply ==
 
== Reply ==
 +
 +
Hello Dmb, what you did looks quite nice to me. DPL can indeed be used to create contents for a publishing system like WikiArticleFeeds. The outer tag structure cares for feed creation, DPL decides what is in the feed.
 +
I wonder what happens if you touch the wiki page and re-save it. If there is one new item found by the query: will the publishing system be smart enough to recognize exaclty this one as "new" and leave the rest in peace? DId you try things like that?
 +
 +
What precisely do you think can be improved?
 +
 +
[[User:Gero|Gero]] 23:09, 26 February 2008 (CET)

Revision as of 23:09, 26 February 2008

Description: Make each DPL into an RSS feed?
Extension / Version: DPL   /   Any
Type / Status: Change Request   /   open

Change request

It would be great if you could use a DPL to output an RSS or an Atom feed. Not sure exactly how the syntax would work, because you would not want to embed the actual XML in the page, but rather see the XML version of the DPL after clicking a certain link...

I have a prototype running from the MetaBase homepage, which you can see directly here; http://biodatabase.org/index.php?title=Template:New_Database_List/Feed

That prototype works by using the 'WikiArticleFeeds' (version 0.6.3) extension, which can be found here; http://jimbojw.com/wiki/index.php?title=WikiArticleFeeds

While that is all well and good, it would be nice if it was better!

Thanks for your consideration,

--Dmb 14:06, 26 February 2008 (CET)


Reply

Hello Dmb, what you did looks quite nice to me. DPL can indeed be used to create contents for a publishing system like WikiArticleFeeds. The outer tag structure cares for feed creation, DPL decides what is in the feed. I wonder what happens if you touch the wiki page and re-save it. If there is one new item found by the query: will the publishing system be smart enough to recognize exaclty this one as "new" and leave the rest in peace? DId you try things like that?

What precisely do you think can be improved?

Gero 23:09, 26 February 2008 (CET)