Difference between revisions of "Talk:Extension DPL"
From FollowTheScore
Green Dragon (talk | contribs) (→Question: Minor re-wording) |
(moved private message to User talk:Sledged) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:As a side note, after we installed dpl onto [http://www.dandwiki.com D&D Wiki] we installed Semantic Mediawiki as well. After I read the [[Main Page]] summary it seems like all the features Semantic MediaWiki has to offer may also be doable with dpl. I would prefer to use dpl instead of SMW since SMW tacks an entire extraneous system onto MediaWiki whereas dpl does not. Do you know: can one do everything with dpl that one can with SMW? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | :As a side note, after we installed dpl onto [http://www.dandwiki.com D&D Wiki] we installed Semantic Mediawiki as well. After I read the [[Main Page]] summary it seems like all the features Semantic MediaWiki has to offer may also be doable with dpl. I would prefer to use dpl instead of SMW since SMW tacks an entire extraneous system onto MediaWiki whereas dpl does not. Do you know: can one do everything with dpl that one can with SMW? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 22:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 16:56, 3 June 2009
Question
I am not sure if this is the correct place to ask this, however I just had a quick technical question. When I was trying to upgrade [1] to a newer dpl I could not figure out how to double cross-reference the categories. Is this possible with the new dpl? --Green Dragon 20:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- As a side note, after we installed dpl onto D&D Wiki we installed Semantic Mediawiki as well. After I read the Main Page summary it seems like all the features Semantic MediaWiki has to offer may also be doable with dpl. I would prefer to use dpl instead of SMW since SMW tacks an entire extraneous system onto MediaWiki whereas dpl does not. Do you know: can one do everything with dpl that one can with SMW? --Green Dragon 22:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)