Difference between revisions of "Issue:The include Parameter and Mulitple Template Invocations"
From FollowTheScore
(→Reply) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
In principle it should not be too complicated to do that. But at the moment I am quite busy with other things than DPL; would you like to implement that feature? [[User:Gero|Gero]] 23:58, 11 December 2007 (CET) | In principle it should not be too complicated to do that. But at the moment I am quite busy with other things than DPL; would you like to implement that feature? [[User:Gero|Gero]] 23:58, 11 December 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'll see what I can do. I'm still trying to modularize the DPL2 code. I've started with the transclusion code. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 00:05, 12 December 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::''Rest of discussion moved to [[Issue:Modularize DPL Code]]'' | ||
Latest revision as of 00:15, 19 December 2007
| Description: | Using the include parameter returns all invocations of a specified template |
| Extension / Version: | DPL / 1.6.0 |
| Type / Status: | Bug/Change Request / open |
Problem
So in continuation of this discussion, I've come across a situation where there are a number of pages that have multiple calls to the same template, and I need to get the first (and only the first) invocation of a template call. Right now DPL2 returns all invocations of a specified template. So what started as a question of curiosity now becomes a request/bug. —Sledged (talk) 22:31, 11 December 2007 (CET)
Reply
In principle it should not be too complicated to do that. But at the moment I am quite busy with other things than DPL; would you like to implement that feature? Gero 23:58, 11 December 2007 (CET)
- I'll see what I can do. I'm still trying to modularize the DPL2 code. I've started with the transclusion code. —Sledged (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2007 (CET)
- Rest of discussion moved to Issue:Modularize DPL Code
