Difference between revisions of "Issue:Noinclude tags ignored"
From FollowTheScore
(add issue) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Reply == | == Reply == | ||
| + | As far as I am aware of, Labeled Section Inclusion is not aware of include / noinclude. You can include a labeled section with the original LST or with DPL (DPL contains a modified copy of the LST code). Both should behave in the same way. | ||
| + | :[[User:Gero|Gero]] 08:42, 10 January 2008 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:42, 10 January 2008
| Description: | When including page contents, the noinclude tag is not respected |
| Extension / Version: | DPL / ? |
| Type / Status: | Bug / open |
Problem
If I'm using Labeled Section Transclusion to get text from the pages that are returned by the DPL call, and those pages have <noinclude> tags in them, they are ignored. Is this a problem with DPL, or a problem with the LST extension? --Jonathan Kovaciny 05:32, 10 January 2008 (CET)
Reply
As far as I am aware of, Labeled Section Inclusion is not aware of include / noinclude. You can include a labeled section with the original LST or with DPL (DPL contains a modified copy of the LST code). Both should behave in the same way.
- Gero 08:42, 10 January 2008 (CET)
