Difference between revisions of "Issue:DPL does not work with Cite-Extension under MW1.12/Demo1"
From FollowTheScore
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a test page regarding the CITE extension and DPL.<br/> | This is a test page regarding the CITE extension and DPL.<br/> | ||
− | * | + | * Let "f" be a line that contains a "ref"-tag |
− | * | + | * Let "r" be the "references"-tag. |
+ | * Let "d" be a dpl statement | ||
− | + | The we observe the following: | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | f1 | |
− | + | f2 | |
+ | r | ||
+ | will produce references for f1 and f2 | ||
+ | f1 | ||
+ | f2 | ||
+ | r | ||
+ | d | ||
+ | will produce references for f1 and f2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | d | ||
+ | f1 | ||
+ | f2 | ||
+ | r | ||
+ | will produce references for f1 and f2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | f1 | ||
+ | f2 | ||
+ | d | ||
+ | r | ||
+ | will produce NO references | ||
+ | |||
+ | f1 | ||
+ | d | ||
+ | f2 | ||
+ | r | ||
+ | will produce references ONLY for f2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | f1 | ||
+ | r | ||
+ | d | ||
+ | f2 | ||
+ | r | ||
+ | will produce two references, one for f1 and another one for f1 and f2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * f1<ref>footnote 1</ref> | ||
+ | <references /> | ||
<dpl> | <dpl> | ||
Line 19: | Line 52: | ||
</dpl> | </dpl> | ||
− | <references/> | + | * f2<ref>footnote 2</ref> |
+ | <references /> |
Revision as of 16:51, 3 February 2011
This is a test page regarding the CITE extension and DPL.
- Let "f" be a line that contains a "ref"-tag
- Let "r" be the "references"-tag.
- Let "d" be a dpl statement
The we observe the following:
f1 f2 r
will produce references for f1 and f2
f1 f2 r d
will produce references for f1 and f2
d f1 f2 r
will produce references for f1 and f2
f1 f2 d r
will produce NO references
f1 d f2 r
will produce references ONLY for f2
f1 r d f2 r
will produce two references, one for f1 and another one for f1 and f2
- f1<ref>footnote 1</ref>
<references />
- f2<ref>footnote 2</ref>
<references />