Difference between revisions of "Issue:DPL does not work with Cite-Extension under MW1.12"
From FollowTheScore
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
</nowiki></pre> | </nowiki></pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Demo ==== | ||
| + | * [[Issue:DPL_does_not_work_with_Cite-Extension_under_MW1.12/Demo1|Demo1 (parser extension mode)]] | ||
| + | * [[Issue:DPL_does_not_work_with_Cite-Extension_under_MW1.12/Demo2|Demo2 (parser fuction mode)]] | ||
=== Workaround === | === Workaround === | ||
Revision as of 12:16, 17 February 2010
| Description: | DPL does not work with Cite-Extension under MW1.12 |
| Extension / Version: | DPL / 1.7.4 |
| Type / Status: | Bug / open |
Problem
When using DPL together with the Cite-Extension by Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason under MediaWiki 1.12 the following error occurs:
Using a DPL-statement between(!) a <ref>- and a <references/>-statement will leave the corresponding references empty (no references are displayed).
Example-Code
This is a test<ref>This is some footnote-text</ref> <dpl> ... Here comes some DPL-code ... </dpl> == References == <references/>
Demo
Workaround
Set $wgParserConf['class'] = 'Parser_OldPP'; in LocalSettings.php of your MW-Deployment and use the parser function syntax of DPL.
Update
The problem still exists with the newly released MW1.13.
- This issue still occurs in MW 1.15.1, too! tedo 20:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Reply
Does the same problem occur when you use a parser function call for DPL ({{#dpl: ...}}) ? An old version of Cite is installed here in this wiki ... Gero 06:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
